Abusive and manipulative mother informed of son’s rights and choice to live with his father.

Denied Access Disgust - 201614 year old stands up to his abusive mother for his rights and informed choice to live with his Dad – YouTube

This video shows how a 14-year-old boy stands up to his abusive and manipulative mother to demand that she respect his informed choice to live with his father.

Many children find themselves in situations where family courts have given custody to the parent (mostly mothers) who in many cases are not the better parent. Many children are abused by their sole custodial parent as was the child in this video by his mother.

To see another teen’s similar experience with abuse by her mother view this page on YouTube:

Often custody of children is sought by one parent, not because they are the better parent but in order to obtain child support and to exercise control over the non custodial parent. During this video, the boy describes how his mother and her boyfriend assaulted him just because he wanted to wear his boots from his mother’s home to his father’s home.

Best Interest - 2016

Many immature and sick in the mind custodial parents wont even allow their children to take toys or personal possessions to the other parent’s home due to their obsession to control the child. The mother at 8:17 tells her son that “Daddy” (Her new partner) was going to call the cops on him. Many parents force their children to recognize their new partner as mommy or daddy and further insult to the biological parent.

Tragically, once children become teenagers, they fight their custodial parent to be back with their other parent. This often reopens custody and child support disputes which the lawyers like of course because this means business for the legal system. 50/50 shared parenting from the time of separation and no child support in most cases would make children happier and and largely eliminate the court battles over child support and custody and eliminate putting children into the type of situation which this video demonstrates.Abusive Family Courts-What we face - 2016As far as the actions of police in this video, all police officers should do what was done by the police officers in this video and to not support the custodial parent but only to limit their authority to keeping the peace, respecting the child’s freedom and not taking sides in a custody dispute. Unless there is a court Order ordering the police to intervene and apprehend a child, police should simply stay neutral in these matters.

To see another teen’s experience with abuse by her mother view this page on YouTube:

For other information and children’s testimony about abuse of children and families by the family court system, child protection workers, children’s lawyers and police as the result of separation and divorce visit www.canadacourtwatch.com

11 thoughts on “Abusive and manipulative mother informed of son’s rights and choice to live with his father.

  1. Pingback: Guilty of blocking your ex’s parenting time with your children – Family Court Reform

  2. Pingback: Abusive and manipulative mother informed of son’s rights and choice to live with his father. | Children's Rights

  3. Pingback: To interfere at any time with that contact , that natural bond, that dignity, is to defrock him as a parent, diminish his very identity as a man, and likely scar his children forever. – Americans for Equal Rights for Fathers

  4. Pingback: Fathers are more involved with their children than ever before…but – American Fathers

  5. Pingback: Divorce can turn lovers into warriors and children into refugees – Family Law Reform

  6. Reason for Protest:
    To bring awareness to the corruption and fraudulent acts of Family Courts and Child Protective Services. Our children, parents and families are being abused, destroyed and in some cases, murdered while the APA maintains its “no policy” policy, which we believe contributes to the problem which consist with the corruption within the system that is supposed to be in the best interest of our children and families. We ask for a conference:

    Sponsors: Truth Exposed, Central Ohio Parental Alienation, the National Alliance of Targeted Parents.

    In support of a petition:

    In support of the NATP Strategic Plan to Fight Child Psychological Abuse (see the NATP Facebook page)

    Peaceful, polite protests also to be held simultaneously at State APA Headquarters and at Psychological Organizations around the world:

    Sign/Poster Themes:
    – “Collusion with Delusion Must Stop”
    – “Mental Health Must Not Be Complicit in Child Abuse”
    – “Pathogenic Parenting is Child Abuse”

    1. A parent beat/drowned their children to death rather than let the other parent see them. The APA has neither acknowledged the obvious motive nor condemned the motive, by virtue of its “no position” policy:

    2. Another parent shot their children rather than let them see the other parent. The APA has neither acknowledged the obvious motive nor condemned the motive, by virtue of its “no position” policy:

    3. A parent manipulated a child to enter into a suicide pact, rather than let the child see their other parent. The APA has neither acknowledged the obvious motive nor condemned the suicide pact, by virtue of its “no position” policy:

    4. Since we first contacted the APA to request a revision of the APA policy on parental alienation, a child was diagnosed with cancer and died. The child was denied an opportunity for one of his parents to tell him how much he loved him. A hospital administrator misinterpreted the hospital’s policy. The APA is unable to condemn this tragedy by virtue of its “no position” policy. The parent is one of the protestors.

    5. A teen says she had been manipulated/controlled to say she hated her other parent. The APA has neither acknowledged nor condemned this manipulation, by virtue of its “no position” policy:

    6. The APA has not responded to the testimony of a teen, who says “And then the child therapists. What did they do? Nothing! What therapy can you give to children who are suffering because they’re not allowed to see their [other parent]? What complete rubbish. They should’ve enforced it, and I was taken to see three of them. They should’ve given therapy to my [parent], so [they would have] let us go, without terror:

    7. The APA has neither acknowledged nor condemned this incident in front of the Dallas Courthouse, by virtue of it’s “no position” policy:

    8. The APA has not acknowledge that this can and does occur in “intact” families:

    9. By virtue of its “no position” policy, the APA cannot admit that if a parent causes a child to have developmental problems (attachment suppression), psychotic symptoms (fixed false believes about a parent), and some personality disorder traits (splitting, grandiosity, lack of empathy, haughty arrogance, and entitlement), that it rises to the level of Child Psychological Abuse (V995.51), which is defined as significant psychological harm to a child, especially when that parent is displaying the same basic symptoms:

    10. The APA admits that “Childhood Psychological Abuse as Harmful as Sexual or Physical Abuse” but has not discharged its self proclaimed charter, the “dissemination of psychological knowledge about child abuse and neglect to the public, the state associations, and the divisions”;

    11. The left hand of the APA has a “no position” policy, while the right hand of the APA publishes associated peer reviewed research in its journals and publishes the 2015 “APA Handbook on For http://www.facebook.com/AmericanFathers/info

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s