Citizens have literally invited the government to control every area of the lives of children and their families.

Education is salvation for your family.” ~ Nancy Rolfe

GOVABUSE® Founder

This has made obsolete, the role of parents and grandparents and weakened the entire country. 

Parental Rights Civil Death - 2016When the governmental agencies separate any family unit,  people become desperate, emotionally unstable, financially destitute spending every dime on hope of reunification and many become physically ill due to the depression, lack of sleep etc…

goodbyeson-j4mb-2016

Many deal with loss of employment resulting from taking time off of work for; court dates, appointments with; lawyerscourt psychologists, evaluators, social workers, guardian-ad-litem and many others involved with cases.

Know your legal, moral and natural rights!Parent have rights - Stand up for Zoraya - 2015

Continue reading

The Corruption of our Government, our Elected Officials, and our Judiciary.

The abuses of parents and children by Family Courtssocial workers, and family law attorneys have harmed parents and children for far too long. We intend to end that abuse
 
Family court is designed by its makers to be probably the most dangerous life event parents and children can endure. It enables and profits from every inhumane instinct known to man—greed, hate, resentment, fear—resulting in abundant cash flow for the divorce industry and a fallout of parent and children’s misery.
 
And behind the curtain of this machine of misery we’ve uncovered its cause—the multi-billion dollar divorce industry, populated by judges, attorneys, and a machinery of tax-dollar fed “judicial administrators,” social workers that George Orwell would marvel at.
We’ve been delivering that message kindly for years now, yet the tide keeps rising on families in crisis. We’ve appealed to the county courts, state and local politicians, state judicial oversight bodies, United States Representatives, and just plain old human dignity, but the harassment and abuse of parents and children has only increased. A resort to federal court intervention in the widespread criminal collusion in state government was the next logical step.
It’s time to recognize Family Court for what it is—a corporate crime ring raiding parents and children of financial and psychological well-being, and devouring our children’s futures. And its not just divorce lawyers—its judges, “judicial administrators,” psychologists, cops and prosecutors—people we should be able to trust—in a modern day criminal cabal using county courtrooms and sheriff’s deputies as the machinery of organized crime.
Since state officials’ hands are too deep into the cookie jar to stop their own abuse, we’re seeking the assistance of federal oversight.
The present-day suffering of so many parents and children has and is being wrought within a larger system characterized by a widespread institutional failure of—indeed contempt for—the rule of law.florida-families-united-childrens-rights-florida-2017-8-1024
Family courts, the legal community, professional institutions such as the state bar, psychology boards, and criminal justice institutions have in the recent decade gradually combined to cultivate a joint enterprise forum in which widespread “family practice” exceptions to the rule of law are not only tolerated, but increasingly encouraged. Professional behavior that would only a few years ago be recognized as unethical, illegal, or otherwise intolerable by American legal, psychological, law enforcement, or social work professionals has increasingly achieved acceptance—indeed applause—from institutional interests which benefit from a joint enterprise enforcing the unwritten law of “who you know is more important than what you know.

More Money In Family Courts - 2016

(ABC 20/20) will expose the Judicial Misconduct of Judge Knutson.

Continue reading

Family Court Intentional Infliction Emotional Distress

Miami-Dade County‘s Family Courthouse Report Legal Abuse Violations-Intentional Infliction Emotional Distress

What Is “Legal Abuse Syndrome”?

Whatever the court setting, whether it is regarding divorce, child custody, parental support, probate matters, personal injury, property disputes, legal or medical malpractice, criminal charges, or other deeply personal issues, the frauds put forth in our courts add greatly to the trauma.

When litigants are unable to get fair resolution to their issues, when the court dysfunction further adds to the litigant’s burden, when no amount of actual case law compels an equitable outcome, litigants suffer often disabling levels of stress. When further attempts to achieve redress fail, litigants display the hallmark signs of Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS). *The concept of Legal Abuse Syndrome was brought to the attention of this writer by investigative journalist Michael Volpe, who’s completing a book on the life and suicide of ones of its victims. The book’s pre-publication title is Bullied to Death: The Chris Mackney Story.

Dr. Huffer, incidentally, invites reports of cases like this one on her website’s Contact page..

It’s Constitutional – Discussing Constitution and Family Law Reform

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Children's Rights: It's Constitutional - Discussing Constitution and Family Law Reform | Kids' Rights and Family Court | Scoop.itJustice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law,natural law, religion, equity or fairness, as well as the administration of the law, taking into account the inalienable and inborn rights of all human beings and citizens,..

Prejudices & discrimination based on a person's sex, social status, gender or race too often rule in U.S. courtrooms!

Prejudices & discrimination based on a person’s sex, social status, gender or race too often rule in U.S. courtrooms!

Intentional infliction of emotional distress

Interest  —  Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is a tort claim of recent origin for intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress. Some courts and commentators have substituted mental for emotional, but the tort is the same. Some jurisdictions refer to IIED as the tort of outrage.

Rationale for classification

IIED was created in tort law to address a problem that would arise when applying the common law form ofassault. The common law tort of assault did not allow for liability when a threat of battery was not imminent. A common case would be a future threat of harm that would not constitute common law assault, but would nevertheless cause emotional harm to the recipient. IIED was created to guard against this kind of emotional abuse, thereby allowing a victim of emotional distress to receive compensation in situations where he or she would otherwise be barred from compensation under the common law form.

According to the first doctrine articulated by common-law courts, a plaintiff could not recover for physical injury from fright alone absent a physical impact from an external source (“shock without impact”), even if the fright was proven to have resulted from a defendant’s negligence, with the case on point referring to the negligent operation of a railroad. Even with intentional conduct, absent material damage, claims for emotional harm were similarly barred. “Mental pain or anxiety, the law cannot value, and does not pretend to redress, when the unlawful act causes that alone. Though where a material damage occurs, and is connected with it, it is impossible a jury, in estimating it, should altogether overlook the feelings of the party interested.” Courts had been reluctant to accept a tort for emotional harm for fear of opening a “wide door” to frivolous claims.

A change first occurred in the Irish courts which repudiated the English railroad decision. The idea that physical/mental shock without impact from an external source would be a bar to recovery was first questioned at the Queen’s Bench in Pugh v. London etc. Railroad Co. In the following year, the tort was first formally recognised in the case of Wilkinson v. Downton [1897] 2 QB 57, although it was referred to as “intentional infliction of mental shock”. Citing Pugh and the Irish courts as precedent, the Wilkinson court noted the willful nature of the act as a direct cause of the harm.

Elements

  1. Defendant acted intentionally or recklessly; and
  2. Defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous; and
  3. Defendant’s act is the cause of the distress; and
  4. Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant’s conduct.

Intentional or reckless act

It is not necessary that an act be intentionally offensive. A reckless disregard for the likelihood of causing emotional distress is sufficient. For example, if a defendant refused to inform a plaintiff of the whereabouts of the plaintiff’s child for several years, though that defendant knew where the child was the entire time, the defendant could be held liable for IIED even though the defendant had no intent to cause distress to the plaintiff.

Extreme and outrageous conduct

The conduct must be heinous and beyond the standards of civilized decency or utterly intolerable in a civilized society. Whether the conduct is illegal does not determine whether it meets this standard. IIED is also known as the tort of “outrage,” due to a classic formulation of the standard: the conduct must be such that it would cause a reasonable person to exclaim “Outrageous!” in response.

Some general factors that will persuade that the conduct was extreme and outrageous (1) there was a pattern of conduct, not just an isolated incident; (2) the plaintiff was vulnerable and the defendant knew it; (3) the defendant was in a position of power; (4) racial epithets were used; and (5) the defendant owed the plaintiff a fiduciary duty.

Causation

The actions of the defendant must have actually caused the plaintiff’s emotional distress beyond the bounds of decency. IIED can be done through speech or action; if emotional stress, must manifest physically.

Qualification

The emotional distress suffered by the plaintiffs must be “severe.” This standard is quantified by the intensity, duration, and any physical manifestations of the distress. A lack of productivity or a mental disorder, documented by a mental health professional, is typically required here, although acquaintances’ testimony about a change in behavior could be persuasive. Extreme sadness, anxiety, or anger in conjunction with a personal injury (though not necessarily) may also qualify for compensation.

An example of an act which might form the basis for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress would be sending a letter to an individual falsely informing the person that a close family member had been killed in an accident.

Pleading practices

In civil procedure systems (such as in the United States) that allow plaintiffs to plead multiple alternative theories that may overlap or even contradict each other, a plaintiff will usually bring an action for both intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). This is just in case the plaintiff later discovers that it is impossible to prove at trial the necessary mens rea of intent; even then, the jury may still be able to rule for them on the NIED claim.

There are some reported cases in which a plaintiff will bring only a NIED claim even though a reasonable neutral observer could conclude that the defendant’s behavior was probably intentional. This is usually because the defendant may have some kind of insurance coverage (like homeowners’ insurance or automobile liability insurance). As a matter of public policy, insurers are barred from covering intentional torts like IIED, but may be liable for NIED committed by their policyholders, and therefore are targeted indirectly in this fashion as deep pockets.

First Amendment considerations

The U.S. Supreme Court case Hustler v. Falwell involved an IIED claim brought by the evangelist Jerry Falwellagainst the publisher of Hustler Magazine for a parody ad that described Falwell as having lost his virginity to his mother in an outhouse. The Court ruled that the First Amendment protected such parodies of public figures from civil liability.

See also

References

  1. ^ LeRoy Miller, Roger (2011). Business Law Today: The Essentials. United States: South-Western Cengage Learning. p. 103. ISBN 1-133-19135-5.
  2. ^ Cusimano, Gregory S. “Tort of Outrage”. LexisNexis. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
  3. ^ For English law, see Victorian Railways Commissioners v. Coultas (1888) 13 AC 222 (woman barred from recovery due to shock despite suffering a miscarriage); for a similar decision in New York in the same month, see Lehman v. Brooklyn City Railroad Co., 47 Hun (N.Y.) 355 (1888).
  4. ^ Lord Wensleydale, Lynch v. Knight (1861) 9 HLC 577 at 598; 11 ER 854, where a married woman unsuccessful sought redress for “slanderous imputation of unchastity”
  5. ^ Mitchell v. Rochester Railway Co. 151 NY 107 (1896)
  6. ^ see Bell v. Great Northern Railway of Ireland (1895) 26 LR (Ir) 428; also citing an unreported decision inByrne v. Great Southern and Western R. Co. of Ireland
  7. ^ [1896] 2 QB 248
  8. ^ http://trucounsel.com/index.php/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress
  9. ^ Taylor v. Metzger, 706 A.2d 685 (N.J. 1998).
  10. ^ GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Bruce, 998 S.W.2d 605 (Tex. 1999).
  11. ^ “Emotional Distress and Defamation in Personal Injury Cases”. Slappey & Sadd. Retrieved 26 July2015.
  12. ^ Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988). 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · Wikipedia

Reform Family Law ~ Stop Hurting Parents and Children
World4Justice : Cyber Protest!

Put Family Justice and Child Welfare Reform at the top of Politicians Agenda!we the people

False Accusation Law & Legal Definition

Prosecute False allegations of DV - 2016An accusation that is contrary to fact or truth is a false accusation. To accuse means to make a charge of wrongdoing against another. Accusation can be a formal charge of criminal wrong doing, like the accusation that is presented to a court or magistrate having jurisdiction to inquire into the alleged crime. It can also be an informal statement that a person has engaged in an illegal or immoral act.


The BEST parent is BOTH parents!! the-best-parent-is-both-parents-20151

Parents must stop making false allegations of domestic violence to derail and gain an unfair advantage in Family Court!

“The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their child is a fundamental right.”

Support the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.

Add 28th Parental Rights Amendment to U.S. Constitution

Dedicated to the proposition that children are best served by having unfettered EQUAL access to BOTH parents.

Father’s Rights In Child Custody & Support Agrrement

Father's Rights In Child Custody & Support Agrrement | Kids' Rights and Family Court | Scoop.it

Longton DM works to preserve the relationship between a father and his children. Child custody and parenting times are all factors we take very seriously when negotiating your rights during a divorce. Our Michigan child custody lawyer will aggressively seek fair and impartial judgments on child custody and support arrangements.divorce process, representing dads in Brownstown, Wayne County dads divorce, Dads divorce Livingston County, Allen Park Family Law Lawyer, Woodhaven Divorce Lawyer, Wyandotte Divorce Lawyer

TALKING BACK to restraining orders

This is the first post on this blog to introduce Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS), a condition proposed by marriage and family therapist Karin P. Huffer, whose books on the subject of posttraumatic stress stemming from court-mediated violations are Overcoming the Devastation of Legal Abuse Syndrome(1995) and Legal Abuse Syndrome: 8 Steps for Avoiding the Traumatic Stress Caused by the Justice System(2013).

“Anyone who has ever worked in a legal aid office or law library has met people whose lives have come unhinged after a bad contact with the legal system. The details vary—they may have lost a business or inheritance or the custody of a child—but the common theme of feeling violated by the legal system does not. Even 20 years after losing a lawsuit, some people who suffer from Legal Abuse Syndrome still carry a suitcase of old legal papers around, desperately hoping someone will help…

View original post 746 more words

Effects of Trauma on Family Court Cases

causes.com/campaigns/44305-world4justice-lobby-forum-justice4children

causes.com/campaigns/44305-world4justice-lobby-forum-justice4children

Miami Demo16LEGAL ABUSE SYNDROME

Effects of Trauma on Family Court Cases:
What is Trauma and Why We Must Address It?
By Linda FieldstoneMiami Demo5

“My children are a gift that God gave me. The state did not receive those children from God and then forward them on to me with conditions. God gave those children to me. I will stand before Him to be judged on how I raise my children, and I don’t believe it’s appropriate for the state to step in and either play God– or play parent.”Purple Keyboard Campaign 4Justice - 2015

The Purple Keyboard & World4FamilyJustice Reform : Cyber Protest Campaign in 2016!

Family Courts are injuring “fit” parents by allowing false allegations of domestic violence strip a father’s right to access his child. There are several well documented “Family Court CAUSED” Post Traumatic Stress Disorder cases logged with the Florida Department of Health. To make matters worse the children are hurting because of the lies. False allegations of domestic violence IS domestic violence. AND Parental Alienation is CHILD ABUSE!!! These lies are formulated by attorneys, recommendations to the clients to file FALSE POLICE REPORTS (Information Only Reports). Parents are unjustly denied access because of the PTSD injury the “Family Court CAUSED”; believing accusations without REAL evidence, not an “Information Only Police Report”. Ironic? YES and ILLEGAL!! (USC Title 18 Section 242) Furthermore it’s DISCRIMINATION by a Family Court Judge who has “Absolute Judicial Discretion” in an EMPTY COURTROOM!!! So lets say you walk into family court to do the right thing, as a petitioner, asking for contact, responsibility, “to pay” child support; then the Judge hits you with her mallet and cripples dad. Then, dad enters limping back into Family Court, the Judge says “you cannot see your child because you’re crippled”. Then the Judge removes herself from the case when dad (petitioner) tells the Florida Bar AND the Judge about the ILLEGAL POLICE REPORT AND PERJURY BY MOM. The requirement and Standard for Preponderance of Evidence to separate a child from a parent IGNORED!!! 08-29595 Evidence inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act: 18 U.S. Code § 3504 – Litigation concerning sources of evidence (a) In any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or other authority of the United States— (1) upon a claim by a party aggrieved that evidence is inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act, the opponent of the claim shall affirm or deny the occurrence of the alleged unlawful act; (2) disclosure of information for a determination if evidence is inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, shall not be required unless such information may be relevant to a pending claim of such inadmissibility; and (3) no claim shall be considered that evidence of an event is inadmissible on the ground that such evidence was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, if such event occurred more than five years after such allegedly unlawful act. (b) As used in this section “unlawful act” means any act the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device (as defined in section 2510 (5) of this title) in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or any regulation or standard promulgated pursuant thereto.

Legal Aid Florida refers Father to “potential” Pro Bono Family Law Lawyer Cynthia Deinstag. Father becomes traumatized and ill after seeing this very large poster hanging inside of Ms. Deinstag’s office and realizing the lawyer specializes in “female” clients only. Ms. Deinstag refuses to accept Father’s Pro Bono Representation Request. Florida Legal Aid abandons Father and ignores his request for Pro Bono Family Law Lawyer / Guardian Ad Litem request and contact attempts. — at http://www.Causes.com/ChildrensRights.

April 9, 2014 · can you please share this pic – family has been missing since july 2013 – possible locations – GEORGIA – savannah , sylvester areas OR its possible they are in FLORIDA thanks xxxx

Please SHARE… as too many lives are ruined FOR LIFE due to our BROKEN systems.

Lets fight to band lawyers & judges from the child custody & support process and put it into the hand of an agency with people that are truly educated and versed in the well being & health of our families. Families members should not be treated like criminals.
Shame on our systems & shame on those that keep children away from good parents!

Your army looks strong! I like the work your doing. Thank you, I’m sure you don’t hear it enough. Please share our flyer with other fathers.

JUSTICE? WITH THESE JUDGES?!

December 23, 2015 · Dear Sir or Madam, Notably this is a very hard and sad time of year for those trapped by the well hidden, socialist state dictatorship, family courts Australia, war on children and families. This time of year yet higher suicide rates are seen around so called family court Where children and families are torchered by atrocities, forced separation, contempt of justice, at the hands of the evil end of town, the aggressive ruthless thug army, of politicians and their lawyers, trafficking children and destroying families.

Will County Pro-se

(( TRUTH- PTSD is a WOUND )) How many families have been exposed to harm by judicial abuse and or government abuse. Protect the child, the family and our HEROES from those who conceal the truth for their PROFIT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkWwZ9ZtPEI
“Now, After” (PTSD From A Soldier’s POV) [contains graphic imagery]

http://www.youtube.com

I went to film school at USC after returning from Iraq. This is what life was like for me then, and this is 100% a true story. Hopefully others – especially …

View original post

A Barometer We Can’t Ignore’

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Researching Reform: ‘Children’s Mental Health in the 21st Century – a Barometer We Can’t Ignore’

A. Do child custody proceedings and family laws violate substantive due process rights of fit parents, as contrary to the United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence that state courts are not to enter the family realm without a compelling interest?
B. Does a child have a reciprocal substantive right to the care, custody, and companionship of his or her parent, reciprocal to that of the child’s parents?
C. Does the current Family Court climate deliberately and systematically violate the civil and constitutional rights of families?
D. Are parents second-class citizens?
E. Is there a nobility in this country?
F. Do Family Courts across America engage in conducting a cottage industry as a RICO Enterprise?
G. Are Family Courts operating a “Kids for Cash” scheme to sell parents’ own children back to them?
H. Has the domestic relations exception of Federal Court created a “black hole” of injustice?
I. Do Family Courts operate as quasi-criminal courts and as such, shouldn’t families be entitled to the same procedural protections as criminal courts?
J. Do Family Courts across America deliberately and systematically usurp the Constitution of the United States of America?
K. Do Family Courts across America deliberately and systematically usurp federal case law such as that of Troxel v. Granville, Santosky v. Kramer, and Griswold v. Connecticut?
L. Are these acts not seditious? Treason?
M. Would it not be better to abolish the Family Courts altogether as they seem to serve no other purpose than to terrorize families pursuant to 18 USC § 2331?
N. Should families negotiate with these terrorists contrary to public policy?
O. Has society changed in a way that requires a change in legal principles?

FRE 501 permits federal judges to announce evidentiary privileges that are not codified, but that should be recognized in view of changes in societal values.
www.change.org/p/u-s-house-of-representatives-u-s-senate-president-of-the-united-states-abolish-the-tyranny-of-state-family-courts-and-enact-federal-legislation-that-provides-strong-procedural-protections-to-families-and-makes-child-sexual-abuse-a-federal-crime-in-th/u/9396366

Continue reading

sb393

waiting for my daughter to resurface

kiwijustice2blog

kiwijustice2.blogspot.com

Walter Singleton

Walter Singleton's blog, dedicated to Aiden Singleton and Seth Singleton living near Chattanooga, TN.

traciie

A Blog about Parental Alienation, & Corruption in the Courts

Savagely Free

Loose threads of thought involving politics, philosophy, mathematics, poetry and beyond...

EQUALITY 4 MEN

The Global Campaign for Men and Boys

My Justice ~~ Patricia A McKnight

The trauma, The recovery, The truth

Saylove

saylove@hiphop.education

101Harmony

CEO / President Of One Y Films USA

Peace Now

responsible human, no hunger, NoDapl, Black lives Matter, Our Children, War, Peace, Democratic-Socialist, America Who?

Miss Back In The Day USA (An AmericaOnCoffee Blog)

Remembering where we have been and our experiences as a nation

%d bloggers like this: