The Law, as written, empowers Judges to protect children from Parental Alienation.

The Law, as written, empowers Judges to protect children from parental alienation.  They have the tools at their disposal to determine the presence of abuse.

The legal profession and the psychological profession are failing to protect children from a foreseeable harm, by ignoring the dynamics of power and control and the presence of Domestic Violence.  The Courts who are responsible for managing the conflict and are beholden on the Psychological professionals and forensic evaluators to understand the conflict.  The law empowers Judges to also obtain information about the conflict through other methods, such as Guardian Ad Litems, Parenting Coordinators, and Court Appointed Special Advocates.

Continue reading

It took two to make me!


“Custody” and “placement” (sometimes called “visitation”) are often confused by the uninitiated. “Custody” has to do with decision-making on the child(ren)’s behalf on matters of health, education, and financial management. “Visitation” has to do with where the children live and when they, in accordance with the judge’s order, are and are not scheduled to be there.

The judge decides who will be primarily in charge of the child(ren)’s health, education and finances, and with whom the children will primarily live. The decision is made after the judge hears from professionals and various other observers and acquaintances who are familiar with both parents and the child(ren), as well as the dynamics of the respective family household. First among the professionals, as determined by state law, is the guardian ad litem (who may be a lawyer) or the custody evaluator (who may be a psychologist). Depending upon the state, one or another of these professionals is appointed by the court to look into the specific situation presented by each case and make a recommendation to the judge as to the “best interests of the child(ren)” in that case.

Being a good dad means both talking the talk and walking the walk. Everyone from the ex to the kids to the guardian to teachers, coaches, neighbors, doctors and shrinks is watching. Show them all what a good dad you are and in the process you’ll actually become a better dad than you were. The inevitable effect of that is that it’s good for you and your children, and smart dads know this. Take this expert advice to heart, and remember: if you want custody of your children, show the world and your family that you are serious about the responsibilities of fatherhood.

Continue reading

Malachi’s Law

gardening - 2016The bill will:
1. Design a “three strikes” for custodial parents who intend to subvert visitation with the non custodial parent and the child.
2. Visitation exchanges will occur at a location in the local police department. Each parent will identify themselves using a fingerprint scanner. Name, date will be recorded into a database.
3. Strike one. Custodial or non custodial parent does not show for the visitation exchange.
4. Strike two. Custodial parent does not show up for the visitation exchange. Child support obligations for the non custodial parent are relieved that month, and will resume the following month.
5. Strike three. Custodial parent does not show up for the visitation exchange, triggering a third degree felony for T.I.C.K – Tortious Interference Child Kidnapping. The State Attorney or Prosecutor will file charges on the custodial parent for T.I.C.K.
6. Exceptions will be made as necessary for health emergencies.
7. Immunity for State Attorneys, Attorneys and Judges will be removed if those parties fail to enforce T.I.C.K. Complaints for violations by any party including Judges and attorneys will be maintained in the T.I.C.K database, available as public information for no charge.
8. Non custodial parents who do not appear for parenting time at the exchange will trigger a 50% increase in child support for that month, since the burden of support will be on the custodial parent.

Malachi 4:6 (NIV)
6 He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers; or else I will come and strike the land with a curse.”

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Parental Alienation is either a form of Domestic Violence or on the continuum of Domestic Violence behaviors.

Parental Alienation is either a form of Domestic Violence or on the continuum of Domestic Violence behaviors.

167 Red Flags or Examples of Parental Alienation

The Alienating parent will exhibit specific behaviors, signs and symptoms than those of the children and the target parent.  The following examples of Alienators behavior are called Red Flags.  The more of these a parent exhibits or enacts, the higher the probability of PAS can make a difference - 2016

Below is a list of over 150 most often used tactics to alienate children from a parent.  A score of 10 or more is an indicator of PAS.
1. Impeding with visitation, despite orders
2. Denigrating the other parent in front of anyone who will listen, including the children, as well as calling the TP or step-parent derogatory names in front of the child.
3. Filing allegations of abuse while constantly dragging the ex into court for child support or alimony.  (Note: A truly abused individual wants to have nothing to do with the abuser, making face-to-face confrontation out of the question..
4. Stopping any contact with the children and the ex’s extended family or friends who disagree with them.
5. Believing that they are above the law, and that all orders/laws were made for everyone else but them.
6. Impeding Communication with the children, including blocking access to school records and meetings and events.
7. Grilling the children about their visit, asking the children to spy or collect evidence.
8. Refusing visitation because the ex spouse has been unable to afford the child support or not made a payment.
9. Statements of constant hatred and vengeance about the ex-spouse
10.Refusal to disclose their home address
11. Refusal to supply or keep the other parent in the loop on medical issues, educational issues, events pertaining to the child/ren and so on.
12. Continually referring to the child as their own children and not the spouses.
13. Continually not enforcing the visitation with the other parent by claiming the children do not want to go (Barring no true abuse is truly going on. and using the excuse that they are not going to force the children to go see their other parent if they do not want to.
14. Impeding any court orders, including Counseling orders.
15. Moving the children away from a parent they once had a loving relationship with, and thus making visitation and a relationship next to impossible.
16. During visitation times, constantly calling the house, to speak with the child/ren or leaving nasty disruptive messages.
17. On days that TP is in a public place the parent shows up to either push, swear at or just intimidate them or the stepparent in front of the child.
18. Making the child feel emotional responsible for the parent’s happiness so that the child is as protective as an adult might be towards a young child.
19. Lying or even involving the child in the divorce proceedings and custody or child support issues.
20. Making the child feel uneasy about talking to their therapist or other official person.Child-Brain-Development - 2016
21. Having the child call his non-custodial parent by his/her first name; instead of Daddy or Mommy
22. Preventing the children from contacting their father by pulling the phone out of the wall, changing their phone number, refusing to allow them to accept calls, refusing to allow them to make phone calls or lying and claiming the children are not home or are asleep.
23. Discussing and involving the children in court, child support and other legal matters, which they should not be involved in.
24. Insisting that the children call the new person in the AP’s life “Mom or Dad
25. Escalating PASing behavior if the NCP commences a new relationship
26. Insisting that the children NEVER call a stepparent “mum” or “dad”.
27. Hanging up the telephone if discussions do not follow “their” agenda
28. When the child is allowed to speak to the TP on the telephone the PASing parent will oversee the call, instructing the child on what to say and how to respond to the TP and force the end of the call if either child or TP fail to conduct the call as the PASing parent deems appropriate.
29. Deliberately pulling the children away if they meet the target parent out i.e. at the shops.
30. Avoiding children’s activities i.e. school events as the target parent may be there
31. Previous evidence of anger management issues
32. Poor family support network or a family network that supports the PASing behavior
33. Refuse to communicate via fax, email or letter as to do so will provide evidence in the form of a paper trail of their activities.
34. Will wait until the last minute to inform the target parent of changes to visitation.
35. Will feel it is their right to provide the children for visitation late but insist the children MUST be returned to the exactly on time.
36. Will not provide any information to the target parent about the children’s day-to-day activities but will insist on knowing exactly what the target parent will be doing with the children whilst they are with the TP.
37. Will choose to pay others to provide childcare and not utilize the TP even if it would be more suitable for all parties.
38. Will claim the child is too sick to visit the target parent.
39. Will claim the TP is not capable of parenting the child “Properly”
40. Cause the child to feel guilt about wanting to see their other parent
41. Avoid, at all costs, using a neutral drop off / pick up location
42. Refuse to allow the TP any contact with ‘Professionals’ who are in support of the PASing parent
43. Not allowing the children to participate in activities, where they may come into contact with children associated with the TP.
44. Will instruct the school that the TP is not to be trusted, inferring or clearly stating that the TP has lied to others about the PASing parent and children, including putting notes in school files about not allowing contact or pick up by Targeted Parent.
45. If cornered about providing TP’s information for school records, Protective Services or any other official, the PASing parent will give false or misleading information.
46. PASing parent has removed pages from a child’s classroom journal that fail to support PASing parent’s ideology and/or support the TP.
47. Totally controlling the children’s social life
48. Becoming overly involved with the children’s activities i.e. cub leader, parent support worker so that they are constantly with the children and keep the other parent from attending these activities.
49. Lie to the children about the separation/divorce including by giving details that are ‘obviously’ untrue which deliberately impede the child’s ability to love the other parent i.e. dad spends all his money on his girlfriends so I can’t afford to let you go to camp.
50. Involve the children in all the aspects of the separation, divorce and on going legalities whilst claiming the child has the ‘right’ to know what is happening.Grandpa - 2016
51. Claiming the TP is victimizing, stalking, abusing, and harassing them to the point of actually involving the police.  Filing of false allegations of abuse,  making false and repeatedly harassing complaints to child protective agencies, police and others so as to constantly put the Targeted Parent under attack and investigation.
52. Encouraging the child to support the PASing parent to lie to authorities on how they are treated when with the TP even though there is no evidence of poor treatment, but just  the reverse.
53. Encourages the child to be defiant, to go on strike, to not comply with the reasonable rules when in the presence of TP.
54. PASing parent deliberately organizes ‘activities’ for the children on the TP’s visitation time i.e. parties, outings and social gatherings.
55. The PASing parent will use bribery and enticements to prevent a child from visiting with the TP, and make the child feel guilty for wanting to be with the TP rather than attend an event the PASing parent has organized to happen during TP visitation time.
56. Not allowing the children to have photos of or objects provided by the TP in the house.   The PASing parent will destroy any gifts, photo’s etc should the child bring them home.
57. When the child receives gifts from the TP and takes them home to show the PASing parent, the PASing parent refuses to allow the child to take them back to the TP’s house or keep them.
58. PASing parent refuses gifts from the TP and his family, actually making the children return them saying they are no good or cheap or useless and so on.
59. PASing parent will deliberately condemn the target parent’s gifts or purposely purchase them ahead the target parent so that the target parent’s gift is meaningless.
60. The PASing parent changes the child’s surname to the ‘new dads’ name without asking or notifying the birth father.
61. PASing parent will attend TP’s family functions without prior invite despite ‘knowing’ that their behavior will be viewed negatively.    The PASing parent will use this negativity to inform the children of the TP’s family’s hatred of them.
62. Refuses to pick up the telephone when the child is calling from the TP’s residence.
63. Insist that when the child is with the TP that they have the ‘right’ to excessive telephone contact with the child, yet allow the TP to have little to no telephone contact.
64. Deliberately changed the telephone number and maintaining a ‘silent’ number without notifying the TP or providing the TP with the number.
65. The PASing parent tells the child that ‘they hope they will be OK when with the TP, that they shouldn’t need to go to hospital, etc. thus creating an image of fear for the child when with the TP.
66. Telling the child that “Something” may happen to the PASing parent whilst the child is with the TP.
67. Demanding the TP pay for extra costs associated with child rearing i.e. Orthodontic work.
68. Informing the child that they cannot have ‘braces’ or other essentials because the TP won’t pay for it.
69. Refuse a child’s request to spend extra time with the TP, even when this time is for a one off special occasion.
70. Refusing to send the child to school for events when the PASing parent becomes aware that the TP will be attending.
71. Removing money placed in the child’s bank account by the TP and not allowed the child to spend it or has not spent it on the child.
72. Tells the child in a deliberately malicious and vindictive manner that a behavior the child is / has done is similar to the TP.
73. PASing parent will excessively emphasize the physical and facial features that are similar to the PASing parent and associated family and ignore or deny features associated with the TP.
74. PASing parent refuses to allow the child to take a pet on visitation with TP even though TP is happy and willing to accommodate the pet.
75. PASing parent has deliberately moved without providing TP details prior to the move.
76. PASing parent has deliberately moved and refuses to provide TP with appropriate details.
77. PASing parent allows a person contact with the child contrary to the TP’s wishes especially when the TP has reasonable grounds for their concern, i.e. domestic violence, previously proven abuse.
78. The child undergoes or has undergone unnecessary surgical procedures without the prior knowledge or consent of the TP when there is evidence supporting the TP’s position.
79. The PASing parent attempts to bribe, extort or threaten the TP into signing court documents that will exclude the TP from the child’s life or enhance the PASing parent’s position.
80. The PASing parent has expressed a desire for the TP to be dead, die or be killed, or severely injured.
81. The PASing parent has expressed a desire for the TP and other family members / friends associated with the TP to suffer some major mishap or injury.
82. The PASing parent attempts or succeeds in changing the child’s religion.
83. Told the child they can’t see the other parent because they are behind in their child support payments.
84. Is unjustly rude and refuses to work co-operatively with the new partner of the other parent for the benefit of the child.
85. Has refused of failed to provide mental health support for the child when there is reasonable evidence to support the child needs and would benefit from mental health intervention.PA IS EMOTIONAL ABUSE-COLLAGE - 2016
86. Refusing to allow the child to participate in weekend sporting / developmental classes as the other parent would be present during the child’s attendance for part / half of the time.
87. Parent has attempted to bribe officials, specialists and professionals to act / report in the favor of that parent even when there is evidence to the contrary.
88. Parent has deliberately mislead, lied or concealed information or evidence to further his or her own case.
89. Parent has physically assaulted the target parent in the presence of the child.
90. Parent has forged, altered or tampered with official documentation to further his or her own case.
91. The parent has submitted false and misleading statements to the police about the target parent and their family that that parent knew in advance to be false and misleading.
92. Has displayed anger / verbal abuse concerning the target parent in front of the child or third party.
93. Has attempted to or actually assisted the child to write letters / notes or to delivery same to the target parent
94. Encouraged the child to support them in their allegations against the target parent despite obvious evidence disputing claims made by both parent and child.
95. Coaching, threatening or intimidating the child to remain silent about incidents the child has witnesses that do not support the custodial parent.
96. Threatening or punishing the child for saying positive things about the target parent.
97. Refused to provide the child for DNA testing when requested to do so.
98. Deliberately cause alienation between siblings when one supports the custodial parent and the other the target parent.
99. Told the child that the other parent does not love him or her that the other parent never wanted the child to be born.
100. Told the child about intimate details pertaining to the marriage, which are inappropriate and done in a way to deliberately cause distress to the child.
101. Has refused to share prescribed medication with the other parent during access.
102. Alienator insists that the target parent’s extended family is not the children’s “real family” or that they are no good.
103. Alienator tells the child(ren. that they have been replaced by the TPs new partner.
104. Alienator tells the child(ren. that they have been replaced by children born to the TP and any new partner – whether or not children have been born.
105. Alienator tells the child(ren. that they have been replaced by the TP’s new partner’s child(ren. and that they are therefore not wanted or loved by the TP.
106. Alienator denigrates all statements, answers, discipline and activities of the TP with regard to their child(ren. .
107. Alienator frequently suggests to the child(ren. that the TP and/or new partner will do harm to the child(ren. .
108. Alienator demands that the TP be subjected to and accept blame for any injury incurred by the child however minor and natural in the course of life.
109. Alienator forces the child to report minor injuries, bumps and bruises from play to a professional person as being the result of the TP and/or new partner.
110. Alienator shaves off the child’s hair when the cut is provided by the TP stating that the cut is bad and the hair ruined.
111. Alienator refuses the TP to comfort the child when injured in play.
112. Alienator demands medical intervention for minor illnesses (ie. Demanding antibiotics for colds. and play injuries.
113. Alienator undertakes “doctor shopping” until a practitioner sympathetic to their cause is found.
114. Alienator does not comply with appropriate medical advice from practitioners who are not sympathetic to their cause.
115. Alienator actively damages (cutting, tearing or staining. clothing provided for the child by the TP.
116. Alienator refuses reasonably required medical treatment where the TP has sought review for a serious medical condition, which impairs the child or causes them to suffer.
117. Alienator allows the child to undertake activities after separation from TP, which were previously refused and blames the TP for denying the child such activities.
118. Alienator refuses to allow the child(ren. time alone with other adults or children.
119. Alienator refuses to allow children to attend sleepovers with friends accusing friends parents of abuse.
120. Alienator refuses to allow sleepovers stating that they ‘do not want the children to see how others live.”
121. Alienator frequently tells the child(ren. that TP will harm them, has mental health problems etc. creating a fear of the TP.
122. Alienator informs the child(ren. that the TP has a criminal record for harming children.
123. Alienator will not allow the child(ren. to undergo any medical or psychological assessment without being present.
124. Alienator informs the child(ren. that they were unwanted by the TP and that the TP insisted that pregnancy be terminated.
125. Alienator insists that TP’s family never accepted she or the children and insisted that the pregnancy (ies. be terminated.
126. Alienator blames TP for poor food quality, housing quality and/or availability of funds even where child support is paid and/or alienator contact is minimal.
127. Alienator blames TP and new partner for stealing home, food, resources from the Alienator and child(ren. .
128. Alienator ignores the child(ren. when they discuss activities with the TP.
129. Alienator becomes angered when the child(ren. discuss activities with the TP.
130. Alienator becomes angered when the child(ren. express a desire to see/phone the TP.
131. Alienator becomes angered when child(ren. engage in mother’s/father’s day activities at school which are focused on the TP.
132. Alienator becomes angered when child expresses desire for contact with TP to school teachers/mates/colleagues.
133. Alienator removes child from school and relocates child without cause if the child expressed a desire for contact with TP.
134. Alienator informs child(ren. that TP is happier without them.
135. Alienator informs child(ren. that TP does not love them anymore, is never going to see them again, does not want them any more.
136. Alienator accuses the child(ren. of causing rifts/separation in the marriage.
137. Alienator informs child(ren. that TP is leaving THE CHILD(REN. rather than the marriage or the alienator.
138. Alienator accuses the TP of infidelity in earshot of the child(ren. .
139. Alienator writes letters ‘on behalf’ of the child(ren. claiming that the child(ren. have had input.
140. Alienator actively seeks to ensure that children believe that TP sends no letters, gifts or monies.
141. Alienator removes and destroys any items sent to the child(ren. through an outside facility (ie. School, grandparent. . This usually occurs on leaving the facility and appearing publicly to accept the items for the child.
142. Alienator actively destroys and discards any gifts or letters that the child(ren. do see.
143. Alienator insists that the child(ren. refer to TP using only a derogatory term (ie. The Bastard.
144. Alienator presents school teachers/principals with falsified documents/letters from practitioners or the AP.
145. Alienator pawns the TP’s personal and private belongings citing financial hardship to the child(ren. .
146. Alienator pawns or returns to the retailer, gifts from TP citing financial hardship to the children.
147. Alienator takes every opportunity to belittle the TP, in the presence of the child(ren. , when seeking assistance from welfare agencies and providers.
148. Refuses to provide TP with vital medical information thereby impeding the child(ren. s medical wellbeing.
149. Refusing to notify TP of identified allergies.
150. Refusing to notify TP of medical concerns or treatments for child(ren.
151. Accuse TP of stealing items the child has lost.
152. Attributing failure in school activities/studies to TP.
153. Accusing TP of neglecting the child(ren. .
154. Denies essential medical care or treatment on the basis of financial hardship caused by TP.
155. Consumes drugs, cigarettes, or alcohol and blaming TP for addictions.
156. Purchases personal luxuries whilst denying children essentials and blaming TP for financial hardship.
157. Refusing to allow child to bid TP goodbye after visitation with any affection shown in front of Alienator.
158. Makes derogatory noises/comments when child or TP exhibit affection in presence of alienator.
159. Accuses TP of displaying affection to child(ren. for ulterior motive.
160. Accuses TP of PAS behaviours.
161. Denigrates new partner or partner’s children to PAS children.
162. Makes accusations of abuse against TP’s new partner.
163. Makes accusations of abuse against TP’s extended family.
164. Makes accusations of abuse against TP’s consequent children or children of new partner.
165. Contacts TP’s extended family in presence of child(ren. to make false allegations of abuse/neglect/PAS.
166. Refuses to allow child to give gifts/notes/paintings/letters to TP, new partner, children or extended family.
167. AP is constantly rude, nasty, controlling and dictates when, where and what the TP can do with the kids during their time.  This attitude is also permeated to the children who are rude, nasty, controlling and dictate when, where and how they will spend their time with the TP.

Source Link:  http://www.klothcon … attachment

The Petition is available at to sign up.Support Judge Gorcyca - Parental Alienation is Child Abuse - 2016


Malachi's Law

Proposed solution…MALACHI’S LAW
We believe that Parental Alienation or PAS deserves legislative changes. Although we are weary of the overbearing enormity of big government, the tears of our children whom God stores in a bottle and the blood of our forefathers who died for our constitution cries out for change in the form of Malachi’s Law. Please follow the link for a full explanation of Malachi’s Law. In short, we believe the severity of the damage inflicted on our helpless, vulnerable children justifies criminalizing Parental Alienation or PAS to a minimum third degree felony with mandatory prison time.
Malachi’s Bill is citizen’s answer to unresponsive, corrupt family courts:

The bill will:
1. Design a “three strikes” for custodial parents who intend to subvert visitation with the non custodial parent and the child.
2. Visitation exchanges will occur at a location in the local police department. Each parent will identify themselves…

View original post 3,809 more words

Reporting misconduct using the proper form and wording is the only way you can be heard

Kindly consider our chart setting out the seven (7) basic forms of or avenues to judicial accountability. These are the ways that judges…Read More


78b6a-judicialabuseReporting misconduct using the proper form and wording is the only way you can be heard, and the only way authorities and legislators can…Read More  

Reporting Bad Practices

My Advocate Center

Reporting misconduct using the proper form and wording is the only way you can be heard, and the only way authorities and legislators can see what is happening. There are many forms of misconduct when it comes to professionals handling matters related to divorce and child custody.  And this arena is ripe for taking advantage of those in need.…Read More

Judicial Discretion 2 - 2015Excerpt: In February of last year, we wrote about a piece in The Guardian which explained that judges who show persistently poor…Read More  

Judicial Bias – A Fine Balance

Researching Reform

The subject of judicial bias has always fascinated Researching Reform and in the family justice system, where discretion is not just an afterthought but a much-used tool, bias can be magnified and in turn can affect judgement. In February of last year, we wrote about a piece in The Guardian which explained that judges who show persistently poor…Read More

STOP ABSOLUTE DISCRETION OF FAMILY COURT JUDGESWe The People are not going to sit idle while Corruption continues…

Glen - 2015

Photo credit: GuardianA. Do child custody proceedings and family laws violate substantive due process rights of fit parents, as contrary to the United States…Read More  

Plaintiffs have hereby posed the following questions to the Federal Court:

Plaintiffs have hereby posed the following questions to the Federal Court: Jan 23, 2015 — A. Do child custody proceedings and family laws violate substantive due process rights of fit parents, as contrary to the United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence that state courts are not to enter the family realm without a compelling interest? B. Does a…Read More

Featured Image -- 1287Jan 25, 2015 — Excerpt from an upcoming RICO case: “Furthermore, the averments as stated herein speak to a violation by the Defendants of…Read More  

Family Court Proceedings Violate 6th Amendment Rights and Miranda Law

Family Court Proceedings Violate 6th Amendment Rights and Miranda Law Jan 25, 2015 — Excerpt from an upcoming RICO case: “Furthermore, the averments as stated herein speak to a violation by the Defendants of Plaintiffs’ Sixth Amendment rights, as this persecution of the Plaintiffs was quasi-criminal in nature. As such, the Defendants violated…Read More

Featured imageThere are thousands of other parents in the same situation! We can change the world by putting an end to this.  

United States Supreme Court: Grant Writ of Cert filed November 4 to determine whether child custody proceedings and family laws violate the rights of fit parents, and whether children have reciprocal rights to the care and custody of their parents?

Child custody proceedings are daily affecting the lives and fundamental and constitutional rights of millions of parents, children and families. Each year, 5.7 million domestic orders are decided in state courts, dominated by divorce. Add cases reopened to modify support, custody, visitation, and we have an epidemic.

Featured Image -- 1213Karin Wolf has brought an action under The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and 42 USC §1983 to combat fraud and…Read More  

U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, President of the United States: Abolish the Tyranny of State Family Courts and Enact Federal Legislation That Provides Strong Procedural Protections to Families and Makes Child Sexual Abuse a Federal Crime in th

Karin Wolf has brought an action under The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and 42 USC §1983 to combat fraud and vindicate federal constitutional rights in State Court. U.S. District Court, Newark, Case No. 14-cv-5985, Wolf v. Escala, et al. Family Courts across the country are running an Enterprise, through a calculated…Read More


172ff-we2bthe2bpeople2bare2bwatchingAt the outset, let me summarize my thoughts on this subject, then discuss it in somewhat more detail. There can be no question that…Read More  

Judicial Misconduct and Discipline

Cato Institute

Mr. Chairman, distinguished members of the subcommittee: My name is Roger Pilon. I am a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and the director of Cato’s Center for Constitutional Studies. I want to thank Chairman Hyde of the committee and Chairman Coble of the subcommittee for their invitations to me to testify on the important issue of…Read More

Bad Judges - 2015In the past five years, the Florida Supreme Court has only ordered two other judges removed. The court’s decision is not final until the…Read More  

Florida’s Highest Court Removes Broward Circuit Judge

Nina Agrawal

The Florida Supreme Court has ordered that Broward Circuit Judge Laura Marie Watson be removed from the bench, saying in an opinion that her actions as a practicing attorney were “fundamentally inconsistent” with the responsibilities of being a judge. 

The ruling stems from allegations of professional misconduct by Judge Watson in a complex…Read More

“To think that a judge would pre-sign an order and give police carte blanche to take away kids whenever they want, without even reviewing…Read More  

Lawsuit against judge over child’s removal can go forward


DETROIT (WXYZ) – A federal judge has ruled that a couple’s lawsuit against a Wayne County judge can go forward. They accuse family court Judge Judy Hartsfield of improperly having their son removed from their custody, relying on pre-signed child-removal orders filled out by a clerk. “It was an unbelievable nightmare. Far worse than the death…Read More

OP Family Law CPS Reform Pic2 - 2015A Worldwide Event! The injustice of the Family Court System, and it’s agencies that are supposed to help… Read More and W r i t e O N E L…Read More  

CT court employees face tough questions over conflicts of interest | Washington Times Communities


W r i t e O N E L e t t e r — A Worldwide Event! The injustice of the Family Court System, and it’s agencies that are supposed to help…Read More

Parental Rights Causes - 2015The BEST Parent is BOTH Parents!!  

12th Circuit Court Judge Janette Dunnigan Moition to Disqualify

Children’s Rights

Children’s Bill of Rights WHEN PARENTS ARE NOT TOGETHER Every kid has rights, particularly when mom and dad are splitting up. Below are some things parents shouldn’t forget — and kids shouldn’t let them — when the family is in the midst of a break-up. You have the right to love both your parents. You also have the right to be loved by both…Read More

Liar Joel Greenberg - Broward Florida Family Law Lawyer -- 2015A tragedy in New Jersey exposes the broken family court system. Posted: Divorce Corp. – June 22 at 5:30pm  

PIX11 Investigates: Calls resound to reform ‘fraud’ NJ family court

New York’s PIX11 / WPIX-TV

NEW JERSEY — Half of all marriages in the United States end in divorce, but some experts say getting through the family court system can be like going through purgatory. They describe the process as fraudulent, corrupt, and sometimes deadly. And the case of the Seidle family, which dozens of witnesses watched play out on a New Jersey street this…Read More

ba768-divorce18Divorce Corp. June 25 at 2:09pm · Please read this message from judicial reformer, Dr. Richard Fine: Please pull out all stops. Please…Read More  For those of you who haven’t visited us on Facebook recently, here is what people are talking about

Divorce Corp

The FBI could use our help. No more custody for cash! Published on June 3, 2014 We intend to organize a national conference on family law reform in Washington, D.C. on November 15th and 16th, 2014.   Family Law Reform Published on May 31, 2014 We intend to organize a national conference on family law reform in Washington, D.C. on…Read More

7397a-departmentofjusticecivilrightsdivisionspeciallitigationsectionThe FBI could use our help. No more custody for cash! Published on June 3, 2014 ~~…Read More  

Childrens Rights Florida


WE LOVE DADDYTHE SUPPORT GROUP Every Monday evening in the community room of the Grass Valley library, Emily Gallup, the former court mediator, hosts…Read More  

Chapter 15. Solutions

Divorce Corp

        When the law gets hopelessly bogged down, as is true of our present divorce law, reform is best accomplished by a fresh start from a new premise. That has been the history of the evolution and growth of our legal system. —Reginald Heber Smith, “Dishonest Divorce,” Atlantic Monthly, 1947 THE SUPPORT GROUP Every Monday evening in the…Read More

ff7d4-well2bbeing2bof2bchildSTOP BY THE NEW FAMILY LAW REFORM WIKI, FAMILYPEDIA. Become a member and add content or simply browse the Familypedia pages. This is a…Read More  


Divorce Corp

The Divorce Corp Wiki, Familypedia, is a place where you can come to learn about family law reform efforts from around the United States or contribute information about all things related to family law and family law reform yourself. We hope this becomes a resource for information about family law statutes, case law, regulations, and professional…Read More

Unfriendly Family CourtsDear Honorable Chief Judge Robert J. Colombo, Jr, c/o: and John Homan, State Court Administrative Office, c/o:…Read More  

Judge says man must pay $30K in child support for kid who is not his


(WXYZ) – It is a story that inspired outrage. Carnell Alexander says he got a shock during a traffic stop in Detroit in the early 1990s. The officer told him he is a deadbeat dad, and that he was under arrest. The problem? Carnell didn’t have any kids. He’d been made dad by default after an ex listed him as father when applying for welfare…Read More

Pink-Slip-To-Incompetent-Judges1-150x150Equal parents’ rights is best for the children. If you don’t believe, read my story:,  

Mario Jimenez Jerez’s Campaign to Raise your right hand and read aloud the following:


Equal parents’ rights is best for the children. If you don’t believe, read my story:,

daf5f-parentalrightshumanrightsI hope to be able to change the current system that is being practiced and encourage a more balanced system of justice that this country…Read More 

Marlene McCabe’s Campaign to Get the News Media Attention on Family Law Reform


I had to deal with CPS with my own children. They tried to terminate my parental rights but I fought back and won an appeal. I was told that I was the 2nd person in Napa County to get an extension on my family services. The judge gave me 3 more months. All I needed was 2 weeks more to complete the last thing on my list of court ordered…Read More

05691-knowtheindustry2521The campaign to Get the News Media Attention on Family Law Reform was created by David Inguanzo and has won 1,258 signatures so far.  

Ed Bonfrancesco’s Campaign to Get the News Media Attention on Family Law Reform


Judges continually are biased in favor of the alimony recipient, and punishes the alimony payer. Judges continually will not issue restraining orders against women (from men), and I’ve actually had a judge say to me “I don’t use evidence–I just go by my gut feeling.”, when I had audio, text, and email evidence of clear harassment. The family…Read More

361e6-havingafatherisahumanrightDue to the unequally treatment of fathers by the family court system and the usd if money by greedy lawyers who don’t care about the…Read More  

Buffy Lyn DeSantis’s Campaign to Adopt Uniform Parenting Time Guidelines


Due to the unequally treatment of fathers by the family court system and the usd if money by greedy lawyers who don’t care about the families the destroy. To bad parents who use their kids to find loop holes to take away a child’s love of their parent.

equal justiceThe campaign to Adopt Uniform Parenting Time Guidelines was created by David Inguanzo and has won 652 pledges so far.  

Scott Borchers’s Campaign to Adopt Uniform Parenting Time Guidelines


I’ve been reduced to a visitor with my daughter. I’ve been repeatedly denied more time with her by her mother. Reasons are simply because our daughter is adjusting to our scheduled visitations. No,this isn’t about Mother’s vs. Fathers it’s about “parents “. Please help all parents in this situation to gain a uniform parenting time guidelines.

EQUAL LOVE POSTERBecause I have a child that is been in the system for a lot of years and they are getting money for him, However mental health is a big…Read More  Katlynn Kirkwood’s Campaign to World4Justice – Lobby Forum- Justice4Children


Because I have a child that is been in the system for a lot of years and they are getting money for him, However mental health is a big problem in the UNITED STATES. But all I am seeing is that they are using our kids for profit. And the prisons are full of them already, the nexted generation is suffering for what reasons, Because they are going…Read More

61b82-childrights2_eng-smThis cause matters to me as the parent of a special needs adult in Washington DC. We are being hauled off to court and having our rights…Read More  Maude Hills’s Campaign to World4Justice – Lobby Forum- Justice4Children


This cause matters to me as the parent of a special needs adult in Washington DC. We are being hauled off to court and having our rights terminated to allow the District and their providers to do as they please. even as the dictates of the providers are not good for the children/adults. We need to see these cases as connected and ultimately…Read More

By Order of the CourtHiding Family Court Injustice  

Stuart ‘Ginge’ Graham wants to Release the Court transcript: are you hiding an injustice?


Release the Court Transcript; if there is no injustice to hide Please sign if you value free speech and an open internet. This is just one example of why: This is an URGENT cause seeking to place pressure on Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service / UK Ministry of Justice to release the transcript of a criminal court hearing in Yate, UK, on…Read More

“So live your life that the fear of death can never enter your heart. Trouble no one about their religion; respect others in their view,…Read More


KAPAAO – Kids Aiding Parental Alienation Awareness Organization ~ Here are some resources to consider if you are looking for books, movies…Read More


More on the Moreland Corruption Commission


Leon Koziol.Com

July 31, 2014– Yesterday, we released the formal complaint in the federal lawsuit filed by parental advocate, Dr. Leon R. Koziol on July 29, 2014. As explained, it challenges First Amendment censorship and state retributions upon Dr. Koziol’s testimony before the New York (Moreland) Commission on Public Corruption. In less than twenty-four hours,…Read More

Other examples of federal lawsuits and other resources. “The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” ~ Simms v. Aherns…Read More


  1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ************************************************ LEON R. KOZIOL, individually and as natural parent of Child A and Child B Plaintiff, -against- COMPLAINT  Case No. DANIEL KING, individually and as New York Family Court Judge; JAMES GORMAN, individually and as Family Court…Read More

Federal removals are a great way to stop the corruption in family courts. Here is some information about it:  Read More

4eccf-causes2bbadge1Parental Rights Class Action – Legal Tips

Legal Tips for *Personal* Cases (update 09-27-14): IMPORTANT:  This page is NOT about the class action lawsuit that is detailed all over the rest of this entire website, but is ONLY a free and public service, provided especially to assist the general family rights movement, and natural/biological parents everywhere in America, learn about what…Read More

Courts must work toward a shared parenting norm – Miami Herald

A pledge to ask my family and friends to make a commitment to bring public awareness to this American epidemic.70743-fatherless2bepidemic2bgraph2b-2b2015

SUPPORT OUR CAUSE ~~ Children’s Rights




The Documentary “THE DISCARDED”

THE DISCARDED tells the story of single father filmmaker, activist and co-director Glen Gibellina , who channels his experience of living through Family Court with the lens of a video camera. By using my unique perspective, I aim to pull the curtain back for viewers and expose how the current Family Court crisis is having a devastating effect on those who are victims and children of the Family Courts. A gritty, firsthand look at a reality most would rather turn away from.

THE DISCARDED challenges viewers to bear witness and confront the daily struggles and hopes of those living through Family Courts of a system that has rejected and abused them with no Judicial discretion.

THE DISCARDED is more than just a film, it is an expression of the anger, sadness, joys and hopes of people who have been historically stereotyped, destroyed, silenced and marginalized by…

View original post 431 more words